Tuesday, February 26, 2013

20 dark prediction for 2013, the year of oppression and insanity.

2013 will go down in history as the year of global insanity. The Earth isn't going crazy, but many of the people who inhabit it certainly are. Madness is about to be unleashed on many fronts: economic, social, political, financial and more. In the near future, you will look back on the Christmas of 2012 and think, "Wow, those were the GOOD times!"

Do not read this article if you wish to continue frolicking in the land of TV delusions, fake news and celebrity gossip. These are the darkest real-world predictions I've ever published, and they are not things I ever wish to see come true. But I can't deny the reality of where things are headed. If we project present-day trends into 2013, 2014 and 2015, the picture becomes a multi-front nightmare.

The madness in America has reached a crescendo. Nearly half the population is now under the mind control of a "cult of personality" political figure named Obama who is deliberately dismantling America one day at a time. Unlike Bush who was simply a tyrant, Obama is a charismatic tyrant, and that's far more dangerous. As you may recall, Adolf Hitler was also highly charismatic and won over the hearts and minds of his followers, using many of the very same speech patterns as Obama, an expert in neurolinguistic programming and emotional manipulation.

Because the population has been mesmerized into a state of near-total complacency, an actual police state society is being rolled out right before our eyes, complete with the planned destruction of the Bill of Rights and the characterization of anyone who believes in the Constitution as a "terrorist."

Both Republicans and Democrats are doing nothing to stop it, as they have been taken over by corporate interests or have been promised positions of power in the new society that they plan to install after they crush the Republic.

With Obama at the helm, America is being turned into a gulag nation, complete with the sexual abuse of the citizens by federal agents (TSA), secret execution lists of American citizens (NDAA), secret gulag prisons and the government's continued staging of mass shootings (Aurora and more) to keep the population psychologically controlled in a never-ending state of fear.

2013 will be 1984 on steroids

The ultimate plan, as you will see rolled out over the next few years, is installing Communism in America, which requires the complete government takeover of the economy, the total disarmament of the population so that people cannot fight back, the "elimination" of all who believe in freedom and liberty, and the official destruction of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

I wish I could say 2013 would be the year of "love" and "peace," but unfortunately these will be used to provide a cover story for hatred, destruction and war. President Obama, the Nobel Peace Prize winner, is already one of the most repugnant war criminals in human history, having launched or continued eight regional wars, complete with the dropping of "peace bombs" on innocent women and children.

As long as Obama talks about "love" at home -- even while firing drone missiles at innocent children in the Middle East -- he is worshipped by his mind-slave minions in the USA. By invoking LOVE, Obama emotionally disarms the People and furthers his agenda of hatred, destruction and enslavement. His supporters have lost discernment and unknowingly are supporting the rise of the next tyrannical dictator.

If we even have a Presidential election in 2016, I will be surprised. 2012 may have witnessed the last shreds of the Republic being deliberately terminated.

The following predictions apply from 2013 to the end of 2015, as I always make predictions in three-year blocks.

#1) The global debt collapse arrives

The so-called "fiscal cliff" is only the beginning of what we're about to witness. When record-low tax revenues are reported in April because of Obama's planned destruction of the U.S. economy, ratings organizations will downgrade U.S. debt, setting off a global selloff that could thrust America into a "nightmare" scenario of being unable to sell more debt (or at least not at reasonable interest rates).

This, in turn, would result in the Fed turning solely to printing new money to buy U.S. debt, quickly accelerating into compounding hyperinflation.

#2) Obama administration attempts to gut the Second Amendment

Obama is coming after the guns, and he's aided by some of the most insidious and psychotic individuals walking the planet today: Joe Biden, Dianne Feinstein, Michael Moore and others.

Their goal is the complete disarmament of the American people so that the government has total control over all firepower, just like in China, North Korea and Hitler's Germany.

It's all pure hypocrisy, of course, because all of these people have their own armed bodyguards. Obama's children are protected by eleven armed guards in a private school. Michael Moore has armed body guards. Dianne Feinstein has a concealed weapons permit in California. They all want themselves to be able to have weapons, but not YOU, the "little people" of America.

#3) Martial Law declared across America

2013 is the year things may break out into mass violence in America. Look for Obama to declare Martial Law and announce a mandatory nationwide gun confiscation measure.

This, of course, will lead to even more violence as armed citizens begin fighting back against an out-of-control federal government that attempts to seize power and nullify the entire U.S. Constitution and its Bill of Rights.

#4) Extreme shortages of guns, ammo, magazines as their barter value skyrockets

Already, guns, ammo and magazines are virtually impossible to find and buy. This shortage will continue throughout 2013 and even well into 2014. Even if strict new gun control laws are not passed, the existing shortage cannot be filled until roughly the end of 2013.

The wait time on purchase many new rifles has already reached one year. It's likely to get even worse in 2013.

#5) Tactical weapon strikes target Iran

The U.S. is very likely to be involved in military strikes on Iran. The excuse will be that "Iran has nuclear weapons," but of course so does America, and the leadership of America is clinically insane.

This old "weapons of mass destruction" sham was the same excuse President Bush used to attack Iraq, remember? Now Obama will use essentially the same ploy to launch another "Peace Prize" war on a nation of innocent people. After all, he's the President of LOVE, right? And there's no better way to express LOVE for people than to bomb their children into bloody bits, Obama believes.

#6) Massive false flag attack carried out in USA and blamed on patriots

This is the big prediction for 2013 - 2015. A very large false flag attack will be carried out by the government and used to blame patriots and gun owners. This attack will be, on the small side, another school massacre or the bombing of a government building. On the large side, it could even be the release of a radiological weapon in a major U.S. city.

The false flag 9/11 attack worked so well to strip away America's rights and freedoms that it will be repeated. But this time it could be much larger, potentially involving the death of hundreds of thousands of people. There is no limit to the evil of Big Government. They will do anything to maintain power and destroy liberty, even if it means "sacrificing" a few hundred thousand innocent lives. Once this happens, Obama will once again take to the airways and pronounce his "LOVE" for the American people.

#7) DHS arms the TSA and begins insane abuses of Americans on roadway checkpoints

The TSA will soon be armed. That's the plan, didn't you know? Take the most psychotic government workers in the nation -- who are already known pedophiles, drug dealers, child porn dealers, thieves and shakedown artists -- and arm them with government weapons to be used against the American people.

Soon, the roadway checkpoints will be set up and armed TSA goons will be molesting women and children on highways just like they already do in the airports!

Remember, TSA "officers" receive no police training. They take no oath of office. They are not "law enforcement" by any stretch of the imagination. They receive a week's worth of training and then are let loose on the American people. (A typical police officer, in great contrast, will receive many months of training and swear an oath to protect the Constitution.) The uniforms worn by TSA are actually costumes with fake badges that mean nothing more than a plastic badge you might buy at a toy store.

#8) The rise of the Resistance: Secret resistance groups begin to form across America

As the crushing of liberties continues across America (censorship, destroying the Bill of Rights, secret arrests, etc.) you will witness the rise of resistance groups. They may take many forms, including info-warriors, online resistance, protests, and possibly even physical resistance groups that carry out missions in the physical world.

The more aggressive, abuse and outrageous the government becomes, the more easily resistance groups will be able to recruit members. This is just an historical fact. In times of peace and fairness, there is little or no resistance. But in times of government oppression and tyranny, resistance grows quickly.

#9) Attacks on the First Amendment accelerate as government seizes websites

You can expect websites like NaturalNews.com, InfoWars.com and many others to be seized by the government following a declaration of Martial Law. The purpose of this is to prevent people from asking questions or being informed. The U.S. press, already tightly controlled by the White House, will be completely taken over to become state-run media much like exists in China.

Natural News is right now working on an "information underground railroad" technology that can allow readers to stay in touch with us without using websites, browsers or email.

#10) The rise of violent rhetoric among the population as disagreements turn to threats

The irreconcilable differences between government worshippers and government skeptics will reach a boiling point, especially over the issue of gun control. Those who worship government vehemently believe that all people should be disarmed and tightly controlled by the "all knowing" government, which they see as the ultimate source of wisdom and love. True Americans, on the other hand, rightfully see government as inherently evil and destructive, and they believe in individual liberty, the Constitution, and genuine patriotism.

Expect to see isolated acts of violence between these two groups. Remember, the government worshippers want to see all the Constitutionalists rounded up and sent to concentration camps (FEMA camps). But Constitutionalists will not willingly go. They will fight back against tyranny.

#11) Global government makes its move

Expect to see UN troops in U.S. cities before the end of 2015. The planned rollout of conflict in the USA is going to be followed by UN troops arriving on the scene to "rescue" the USA.

The whole point of all this is to take over America, disarm the entire nation, and move toward global government run by the insanely criminal United Nations. The military occupation of America will be called a "peacekeeping mission" just like it's called everywhere else that UN troops invade another nation.

Once UN troops start showing up in America, you can expect armed resistance to really kick into high gear. Blue helmets make easy targets for American sharpshooters, and the American people have stored away billions of bullets for a rainy day. There will be no hesitation to fight back against enemy occupation.

#12) Accelerated mainstream media attacks on patriots, preppers and veterans

As all this is happening, the media will unleash a wave of vicious attacks on anyone who owns a gun or believes in the Constitution. Gun owners will be immediately labeled "terrorists," and anyone who talks about the Bill of Rights or the Constitution will be subject to arrest and imprisonment in Obama's secret gulag prisons (NDAA).

#13) Disagreement with the government characterized a "mental disorder"

The criminally-run industry of psychiatry will enter into the fray, providing a convenient "mental disorder" label that can be used to arrest and medicate anyone who opposes government.

"Obedience Defiance Disorder" is already on the books in the industry of psychiatry, and it will be used to deny firearms to anyone who makes any statement whatsoever against the government. If you post a pro-gun comment on Facebook, for example, not only will your Facebook account be terminated, you can also be arrested and drugged for having a "mental disorder."

#14) Continued rise in unemployment, food stamps, welfare as Obama accelerates deliberate destruction of U.S. economy

Obama's planned destruction of the U.S. economy will accelerate from 2013 - 2015, causing millions more people to lose their jobs. Employers will continue offshoring jobs, slashing job positions and job hours. Food stamp rolls will balloon, and the ultimate goal is to make more people entirely dependent on the government so that they will continue to vote for whichever candidates promise the most aggressive expansion of collectivist government.

#15) Criminalization of preparedness activities as government outlaws ammo storage of private citizens

The storage of ammunition, firearms and even food will be outlawed in America. Preparedness activities will be considered "acts of treason" against the nation, and people will be arrested and imprisoned for "prepping."

The government, of course, will continue to stockpile ammo, weapons, food and survival gear. But that's only for government. All private citizens will be criminalized for such actions.

#16) Riots in the streets, followed by Martial Law

At some point in all this, riots will break out. This could be triggered by any number of things: financial crash, bank holidays, the announcement of Martial Law, food shortages, etc.

No matter what the cause, riots will be used to further monopolize power in the hands of government by having government instigators join the riots and start throwing explosives or firing guns. This will allow the media and the government to characterize all crowds as "terrorists" and start opening fire on protesters everywhere. If this happens, it will accelerate the rise of the resistance.

#17) Deliberate food shortages used as a weapon of government control

Thanks to record crop failures in 2012, food shortages are already going to hit in 2013. But they could be made far worse by the government announcing Martial Law and then declaring price controls on food staples. This will result in immediate shortages. The government will then try to step in and control food distribution and supply, creating a total nightmare scenario for citizens.

Food will be denied to areas that have a large number of resistance members. This will primarily target urban areas, where most people own firearms and know how to use them. The strategy of the dictatorial government will become, "Starve 'em out!" (It won't work, of course, because country folks know how to raise their own food.)

#18) Weather becomes even more radicalized, with droughts, floods, freezes

You can fully expect 2013 to be another year of radical weather around the globe. Expect yet more food shortages to occur as crops fail due to floods, droughts and freezes.

#19) Solar weather gets nasty: Solar flares threaten communications

Speaking of weather, solar weather will also take a turn toward the extreme. The sun is entering a high-activity phase of its cycle, and this could play havoc with satellites and even the power grid.

If a large solar flare achieves a direct hit on the planet, it could cause widespread power grid failures followed by a chain of nuclear power plant meltdowns globally.

This could cause a massive population collapse and render large sections of the planet uninhabitable for centuries.

#20) You will be told the answer to all our problems is "MORE government!"

No matter what happens in 2013 - 2015, you will be told that the answer is to have bigger government controlling more of your money and your life. The only reason we have problems today, we're told, is because government doesn't yet have enough control. If we would only give up our paychecks, our jobs, our private property, our rights and our freedoms, government will "provide" for everyone!

Obamatopia!

Of course, there are countries where this has already been tried. Those countries are called North Korea, China, Cuba, etc. Are these countries shining examples of freedom and utopia? Nope, they're the hell holes of the world where disarmed populations suffer under the brutality of communist regimes.

That's the future that lays ahead for America if something doesn't change. Obama has been installed in the White House precisely for the purpose of "terraforming" America into a communist nation. If the American people remain asleep and apathetic, he may actually succeed.

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/038512_2013_predictions_insanity.html#ixzz2M1XxXKlw

Friday, February 22, 2013

Gun Control Was – Historically – About Repressing Blacks.

The Real History of Gun Control.

UCLA Constitutional law professor Adam Winkler – whose commentary has been featured on CNN, The New York Times, The Los Angeles Times, The Wall Street Journal, The New Republic, and numerous other outlets, and who is a contributor to The Daily Beast and The Huffington Post – notes (via the Wall Street Journal):
[The history of gun control in America]  was a constant pressure among white racists to keep guns out of the hands of African-Americans, because they would rise up and revolt.
***
The KKK began as a gun-control organization. Before the Civil War, blacks were never allowed to own guns. During the Civil War, blacks kept guns for the first time – either they served in the Union army and they were allowed to keep their guns, or they buy guns on the open market where for the first time there’s hundreds of thousands of guns flooding the marketplace after the war ends. So they arm up because they know who they’re dealing with in the South.
White racists do things like pass laws to disarm them, but that’s not really going to work. So they form these racist posses all over the South to go out at night in large groups to terrorize blacks and take those guns away. If blacks were disarmed, they couldn’t fight back.
Brendan O’Neill notes at the Guardian:
For years – for two centuries, in fact – gun control was a largely Right-wing, reactionary campaign issue, not a Left-wing one. The fact that it has now been adopted by Leftists is very revealing indeed.
Before the 1980s, Right-wingers and racists were the most vocal in demanding that the states in America should strictly circumscribe gun ownership.
Where the revolutionary government of 1791 made the second amendment to the US Constitution, which insisted on the right of the citizenry to bear arms as a safeguard against tyrannical government, successive legislators and campaigners who were freaked out by the prospect of former slaves getting hold of guns called for a rethink of this fundamental liberty.
So after the Nat Turner rebellion of 1831, when a band of black rebels shot at white slave owners and freed their slaves, the state of Tennessee altered its constitution. Where once it had guaranteed that “the freemen of this state have a right to keep and to bear arms for their common defence”, post-Nat Turner it said “the free white men of this state have a right to keep and to bear arms for their common defence”.
Throughout the 1800s, states passed gun-control laws that were fundamentally racist. So, panicked by the prospect of more black rebellions against white landowners, the North Carolina Supreme Court passed a statute in 1840 that said:
“If any free negro, mulatto, or free person of colour shall wear or carry about his or her person, or keep in his or her house, any shotgun, musket, rifle, pistol, sword, dagger or bowie-knife… he or she shall be guilty of a misdemanour, and may be indicted therefore.”

In the 1890s, Florida also passed race-specific gun-control laws. Then, in 1941, a judge in Florida’s Supreme Court called the laws into question when he overturned the conviction of a black man for carrying a handgun without a permit.

He overturned the conviction, he said, because this law “was passed for the purpose of disarming the negro labourers … and to give the white citizens in sparsely settled areas a better feeling of security. The statute was never intended to be applied to the white population and in practice has never been so applied.”
In the modern period, too, there was a hugely reactionary bent to gun-control campaigns. In the early 20th century new laws, such as the 1911 Sullivan Law in New York City, were passed to prevent the huge influx of immigrants from southern and eastern Europe from getting their hands on guns.

As Gary Kleck puts it in his book Point Blank: Guns and Violence in America, gun control was anything but a liberal cause: “In the 19th and early 20th century, gun-control laws were often targeted at blacks in the south and the foreign-born in the north.”

***
Whatever you think of the National Rifle Association, it is hard to disagree with its observation that: “The historical purpose of gun-control laws in America has been one of discrimination and disenfranchisement of blacks, immigrants and other minorities”.

And avid gun control advocate Robert Sherrill notes in his book, The Saturday Night Special:
The Gun Control Act of 1968 was passed not to control guns but to control blacks, and inasmuch as a majority of Congress did not want to do the former but were ashamed to show that their goal was the latter, the result was that they did neither.
Indeed, this law, the first gun-control law passed by Congress in thirty years, was one of the grand jokes of our time.
http://theintelhub.com/2013/02/21/gun-control-was-historically-about-repressing-blacks/


Tuesday, February 19, 2013

BREAKING NEWS ALERT:Supreme Court to Review Case on Obama’s Forged Documents

On Wednesday, Chief Justice John Roberts of the Supreme Court scheduled a birther case brought on by Orly Taitz which calls into question Barack Hussein Obama’s eligibility to be president of the United States. Dr. Taitz, a lawyer from Santa Margarita, Calif., also made the announcement on her website on Jan. 9.

As of this writing, major news networks such as ABC, Fox News, CBS, and NBC have yet to report on the high court’s decision to review Barack Hussein Obama’s eligibility to hold political office in the United States or any of its territories. The case is identified as Edward Noonan, et al., v. Deborah Bowen, California Secretary of State.

On Feb. 15, all nine justices will gather in conference to review whether Obama used forged government documents and fake identification in order to get elected as commander-in-chief. Edward Noonan, et al., contend that if Obama had been ineligible to run in 2008, other Democratic candidates should have replaced him on the presidential ballot. Additionally, electoral votes from states such as California that went towards Obama should have been deemed null and void.

The Supreme Court‘s website shows that docket file no. 12A606 was originally denied by Justice Anthony Kennedy, a Reagan appointee, on Dec. 13. On Jan. 9, Chief Justice Roberts sent Dr. Taitz’s application to the full court for a review scheduled for Feb. 15.

Despite the lack of exposure from the mainstream media, the issue appears to have gained some steam among conservative bloggers. On Jan. 9, New York Times best-selling author Jerome Corsi suggested that the president’s nominee to head the Central Intelligence Agency, John Brennan, may have played a role in removing birther evidence from Barack Obama‘s passport records.

It appears that in 2008, a State Department insider was simultaneously employed by Analysis Corporation of McLean, Va. (then headed by Mr. Brennan) and was reprimanded for accessing (and possibly altering) Obama’s passport records.

On Wednesday, Dr. Orly Taitz, who represents the birther cause, posted the following on her website:
The case . . . provides a mountain of evidence of Barack Obama using a last name not legally his, forged Selective Service application, forged long form and short form birth certificate and a Connecticut Social Security number 042-68-4425 which was never assigned to him according to E-Verify and SSNVS. Additionally, this case provides evidence of around one and a half million invalid voter registrations in the state of California alone.
The Supreme Court reviews about 10,000 petitions annually in regular conferences. About 100 are selected for further judicial consideration. In this filtering process, the votes of four justices are needed to advance a case. On her website, Dr. Taitz argues that Obama has used false identification, an alias, a fake Social Security number, forged birth certificates and Selective Service applications. [ See a comparison of a regular birth certificate versus one submitted by Barack Obama in this photo. ]

Among the aliases Obama allegedly used are Barry Soetoro (used while teaching law at the University of Chicago) and Harrison J. Bounel. Birthers contend that by entering Obama’s claimed Social Security number (042-68-4425) into background check systems, the name Harrison J. Bounel shows up in search results. Forgery of government documents is considered a felony.

This is not the first time that Obama has had to contend with the birther issue. On Aug. 21 2008, Philip J. Berg, a former deputy attorney general of Pennsylvania, brought a federal lawsuit challenging the eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama to become president. Berg alleged that Obama was born in Mombasa, Kenya and that the “Certification of Live Birth” on Obama’s website is a forgery.

The lower federal court dismissed the complaint as “unworthy of further discussion”. Soon after, Berg filed a petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Supreme Court which was denied by Justice David Souter in Nov. 2008. A second petition was denied by Justice Anthony Kennedy.

A third petition was referred to the Supreme Court by Justice Antonin Scalia. However, the high court rejected the writ of certiorari on Jan. 12, 2009, just eight days away from Obama’s first inauguration as the nation’s 44th chief executive.

A team of forensic experts organized by Arizona sheriff Joe Arpaio have looked into Obama’s birth certificate. In July 2012, Arpaio told Fox News his team’s conclusion that Obama’s birth certification is “definitely fraudulent”. After months of investigation, his forensic investigators had discovered code errors, computer-generated marks, and manipulated seals on the document.

In April 2011, the White House retracted the Hawaii certificate and replaced it with a long form version. Around the same time, business tycoon Donald Trump sent a team of investigators to the state of Hawaii to question Obama’s real place of birth.
Said Trump:
He [Obama] spent $2 million in legal fees trying on to get away from this issue, and if it weren’t an issue, why wouldn’t he just solve it? I wish he would because if he doesn’t, it’s one of the greatest scams in the history of politics and in the history, period. You are not allowed to be a president if you’re not born in this country. Right now, I have real doubts.
The issue gained steam in the midst of a highly contentious election year as Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney gained favor among the voting public. In May 2012, the president’s former literary agent Acton & Dystel produced a previously unpublished leaflet stating that Obama was “born in Kenya and raised in Indonesia and Hawaii”. The promotional booklet was written in 1991 when Obama was at Harvard Law School. It was intended to be part of an Obama autobiography but the project was cancelled.

In Oct. 2012, just days before November presidential elections, Mr. Trump offered to donate $5 million to Obama’s chosen charity if the commander-in-chief would disclose his college and passport records. Trump had hoped that the disclosures would shed light on where Barack Obama was born, his citizenship status, and whether or not he was admitted to college and law school as a foreign exchange student. President Obama ignored Trump’s challenge in media interviews and refused to release the requested records.

However, comedian Bill Maher did issue a challenge to Mr. Trump to produce his birth certificate in exchange for $5 million donated to the latter’s favorite charity. Maher made the offer on Jan. 7 on “The Tonight Show with Jay Leno”. On Tuesday, the real estate tycoon produced a birth certificate showing that he was born in New York City. Trump’s lawyer then issued a letter asking the HBO host to make good on his $5 million offer.
Attached hereto is a copy of Mr. Trump’s birth certificate, demonstrating that he is the son of Fred Trump, not an orangutan. Please remit the $5 million to Mr. Trump immediately and he will ensure that the money be donated to the following five charities in equal amounts: Hurricane Sandy Victims, The Police Athletic League, The American Cancer Society, The March of Dimes, and The Dana-Farber Cancer Institute.
Read original here: http://www.examiner.com/article/supreme-court-to-hear-case-on-obama-s-alleged-forged-documents

Monday, February 18, 2013

The Police/“Citizen” Double Standard

The Arizona police had stopped a man for suspicion of Driving Under the Influence. They gave him a blood test and found evidence that he had been smoking marijuana within the last two to four weeks. Arizona’s law specifies the presence of “the metabolite” of THC. The metabolite that actually makes a user “high” is “hydroxy-THC.” There is however another metabolite, carboxy-THC, which remains much longer but is inactive. It only tells you that marijuana has been ingested at some point in the last two weeks to a month.

The state promptly charged the driver with DUI. An appeals court has now agreed that the driver is guilty.
“The legislature intended to create a ‘per se prohibition’ and a ‘flat ban on driving with any proscribed drug in one’s system… We determined that the legislative ban extends to all substances, whether capable of causing impairment or not.”

So the name of the law is not true. Even if you are not actually driving under the influence you can be prosecuted for DUI.

But if you’re a cop and show up to work half-drunk on alcohol, that’s just fine.
“A shocking new report has uncovered union contracts that allow police officers in Illinois to show up for duty while ‘half-drunk’ or up to one-percent under the state’s legal limit. Three departments in suburban Illinois permit alcohol limits of up to .05 while two others up to .079 – or one percentage below the state’s definition of being drunk – the report by the Better Government Association found. The contracts reason a glass of wine taken with dinner before an overnight shift or a shot of cough medicine or mouth wash as possible sources for the blood and alcohol levels.”
 
Notice the incredible contradiction here. Unlike carboxy-THC, ethanol in the bloodstream is the “active” substance in alcoholic beverages. Secondly, it only takes an hour and a half for the alcohol in a glass of wine to dissipate. Is it really too much to ask a cop not to drink for a couple of hours before duty, or to use a breath mint instead of mouthwash until his shift is over? I could see making these rules for emergencies when cops are summoned without warning. But they make no sense for regular duties.

The fact that the union gets these kinds of rules for police is itself amazing. I’ve worked on a construction site before that had drug tests of all sorts. Any minor fender bender requires an immediate drug and alcohol test—something no cop is subjected to after a shooting. These sorts of protections don’t encourage overall confidence in Illinois’ “finest.”

Since these are two different states, we can’t be sure how it will play out nationwide. But as it stands it sure looks like we have a generation of officials who apply one set of rules for “civilians, and another set of rules for police officers.” (Note: police are supposed to be civilian too!)

Of course, I can’t say this situation is inconsistent. It is only inconsistent if you think that equality before the law is the goal. But that is probably the mistake. The goal is to have two groups of people: a group of those who can be fined and turned into sources of revenue for the state, and a smaller more “elite” group of people who can collect that revenue for the state. In arranging this system, one will start to attract people who aren’t willing to let go of certain “freedoms”—like drinking alcohol right before going on duty—who will also be more effective at revenue collection. In order to have your system of revenue providers and revenue gatherers, you need different rules for the two groups.

But that is not the way America is supposed to be.



Read more: http://godfatherpolitics.com/9495/the-policecitizen-double-standard/#ixzz2LH26Y7j2

What to Make of “If Newtown Shooter Killed Black Kids We Probably Wouldn’t Be Talking About Guns”

MSNBCs Toure Neblett, who is black, made the following racially charged and ignorant claim last week:
“If Adam Lanza had walked into a black public school in this mythical South Brooklyn or in the Southside of Chicago, we would probably not be having a sustained national conversation about guns.”

Most mass shootings in the United States have been committed against white people by white people. If America is so racist, why don’t we see mass shootings of black children?

We just went through the ordeal of a black former policeman from Los Angeles who went on a vindictive killing spree. Then there was John Allen Muhammad who was the 2002 Beltway sniper. He murdered at least 10 people. Blacks have been killing other blacks and few black leaders and black spokesmen like Toure Neblett say much about it.

More blacks are murdered by other blacks than whites kill blacks. Black-on-black crime is pandemic in America’s big cities with large black populations.
“A 2007 special report released by the Bureau of Justice Statistics, reveals that approximately 8,000 — and, in certain years, as many as 9,000 African Americans are murdered annually in the United States. This chilling figure is accompanied by another equally sobering fact, that 93% of these murders are in fact perpetrated by other blacks. The analysis, supported by FBI records, finds that in 2005 alone, for example, African Americans accounted for 49% of all homicide victims in the US — again, almost exclusively at the hands of other African Americans.”

Why are these statistics ignored? Why don’t we hear anything from Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, and the former slave Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee on this issue? It’s because the numbers don’t fit the liberal race-baiting narrative that demands more government money be spent on the very people who are harmed by these government programs. Without these disenfranchised, welfare-trapped voters, liberals could not get elected.

 
There’s one thing on which I can agree with President Obama. Absent fathers are a contributing factor to gun violence. “This is not just a gun issue,” President Obama said to a Chicago audience. “It’s also an issue of the kinds of communities that we’re building.” Chicago had 504 murders in 2012, a 16 percent increase from 2011.

And why do we have absent fathers? Of course, the fathers are responsible, but the welfare state makes it easy for fathers to walk away from their responsibilities. It doesn’t help to blame white society for what’s ailing black communities.

For decades, the idea of the “nuclear family” has been dismissed as an “oppressive ideal,” for whites and blacks. Kay S. Hymowitz writes in her must-read article “The Black Family: 40 Years Later” that was published in 2005 in the City Journal: “Fretting about single-parent families was now not only racist but also sexist, an effort to deny women their independence, their sexuality, or both.” Now we’re about to fracture the family even more by opening up the military to more women in front-line combat roles. Who’s taking care of their children?

Feminists declared that “the problem was not the crumbling of the nuclear family; it was the lack of government support for single women and the failure of business to pay women their due.” And what’s been the result of the pervasive radicalism and subsidization of the single-family home, much of it the result of government programs?
“Remember: 70 percent of black children are still born to unmarried mothers. After all that ghetto dwellers have been through, why are so many people still unwilling to call this the calamity it is? Both NOW and the National Association of Social Workers continue to see marriage as a potential source of female oppression. The Children’s Defense Fund still won’t touch the subject. Hip-hop culture glamorizes ghetto life: ‘’cause nowadays it’s like a badge of honor/to be a baby mama’ go the words to the current [2005] hit ‘Baby Mama,’ which young ghetto mothers view as their anthem. Seriously complicating the issue is the push for gay marriage, which dismissed the formula ‘children growing up with their own married parents’ as a form of discrimination. And then there is the American penchant for to-each-his-own libertarianism.”

When something is subsidized, you get more of it. We have been subsidizing the fragmented family, so we’re getting fragmented children who are destroying their own lives.

Of course, there are exceptions. Dr. Ben Carson is a good example of someone who broke with the mind-numbing statistics. But for every one success story, there are ten tragedies.



Read more: http://godfatherpolitics.com/9506/what-to-make-of-if-newtown-shooter-killed-black-kids-we-probably-wouldnt-be-talking-about-guns/#ixzz2LH0rfrc9

Droid DNA “Hyper Intelligence” Commercial and its Transhumanist Message

droid1

This TV ad promoting Verizon’s Droid DNA phone is weird, cringe-worthy and also promotes something else: Transhumanism. Indeed, the ad does not only sell a smartphone. Not unlike movies and music videos, it normalizes the concept of “upgrading” humans by merging them with machines.

While most of us already entertain a somewhat unhealthy, dependent relationship with our cellphones, this ad makes things creepier by showing the device completely modifying the user’s body and genetic makeup. Yes, it is “only a commercial”, but all of the concepts behind it are real and will be available to a very rich and limited public very soon. Here’s the ad.

The ad takes place in some kind of transhumanist lab where the “Droid DNA Augmentation” process begins. Right from the start, we hear the usual vocabulary associated with transhumanism such as “augmentation”, “upgrade” and so forth. Many people believe that the human body is the most advanced machine on Earth. Not transhumanists.
We then see the guy's DNA makeup being transformed into a black, artificial, robotic DNA string.
When connected to the phone, the guy’s DNA makeup changes into a black, artificial, robotic DNA string. Was that included in his 3 year contract with Verizon?

While showing some kind of robot stuff being shot right in the guy's veins, we hear "neuro-speeds increased to 4G". Isn't that a little creepy and invasive procedure to get a new cell phone?
Something is then shot right in the guy’s veins. Meanwhile, we hear “neuro-speeds increased to 4G”. Yes, they do love “shooting” or inserting things into our bodies under the guise of “its good for you” in order to better monitor and control us.

While scientists are supervising the procedure, we hear "brain upgraded to a Quad Core processor". Really? Our brains are inferior to a Quad Core processor, which will be totally obsolete in about 10 months? Didn't know our brains were Pentium 4's.
While scientists are supervising the procedure, we hear “brain upgraded to a Quad Core processor”. Really? Are our brains inferior to a Quad Core processor, a technology that will be totally obsolete in about 10 months? Didn’t know our brains were Pentium 4′s.

The ad ends with a purely transhumanist slogan: “It’s not an upgrade to your phone, its an upgrade to yourself”. Yes. And then, if they don’t like you, they’ll just re-format your Quad-Core processor brain and re-install a better version of you. Go transhumanism!

Ke$ha Claims She Was Forced to Sing “Die Young”

kesha-warrior-promo_thelavalizard
In the wake of the Sandy Hook shooting, radio stations across the country are dropping Ke$ha’s single Die Young from their playlist. The song’s constant repetition of the words “we’re gonna die young” is now apparently deemed inappropriate for airplay. As  stated in The Illuminati Symbolism of Ke$ha’s “Die Young” and How it Ridicules the Indoctrinated Masses, the entire imagery of the video and of the live performances that accompanied the song were about glorifying death and ritual sacrifices. All of this was interlaced with Illuminati symbolism, hinting that the whole thing was yet another way of the elite to push a culture of death on the masses.

In reaction to this backlash, Ke$ha took to Twitter and posted an unexpected comment: “I did NOT want to sing those lyrics and I was FORCED TO.”
tweet
Ke$ha’s tweet as captured by MTV.com

This tweet was later deleted because it probably pissed off her bosses.
But who exactly forced her to sing those lyrics? Why was she credited as a writer of the song? As I stated in the Die Young article:
“In reality, Ke$ha didn’t do anything for any LOLs. She did not direct the video. She is just performing what she is told to perform, like most pop stars. The fact of the matter is: Illuminati symbols are becoming more prevalent because that was the plan all along – to gradually make them part of popular culture. The occult elite is revealing itself and the masses are dancing to their tunes.”
Pop stars have no control over their careers, they are puppets used to push Agendas. Die Young was all about celebrating the sick culture of death that is prevalent in mass media today. Ke$ha’s temporary tweet gave us a small glimpse of the coercive and forceful nature of the music industry and how it imposes content on stars.

It apparently took a mass shooting to make some people realize that there is something sick and unhealthy in popular culture. I am not for censorship of any kind, but for people to wake up and reject the crap that is pushed on them. Let’s hope other tragedies won’t be needed to make more people see the obvious.